Categoria:

Predicting the Temporal and Social Dynamics of Curiosity in Small Group Learning

Autor: SpringerLink

References

  1. World economic forum (2016) new vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology (2016). http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdf

  2. Standards aligned system (2018). https://www.pdesas.org/

  3. Aleven, V., Connolly, H., Popescu, O., Marks, J., Lamnina, M., Chase, C.: An adaptive coach for invention activities. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_1

  4. Ambady, N., Rosenthal, R.: Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 111(2), 256 (1992)

  5. Berlyne, D.E.: Conflict, arousal, and curiosity (1960)

  6. Cassell, J., Ananny, M., Basu, A., Bickmore, T., Chong, P., Mellis, D., Ryokai, K., Smith, J., Vilhjálmsson, H., Yan, H.: Shared reality: physical collaboration with a virtual peer. In: CHI 2000 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 259–260. ACM (2000)

  7. Cen, L., Ruta, D., Powell, L., Hirsch, B., Ng, J.: Quantitative approach to collaborative learning: performance prediction, individual assessment, and group composition. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collaborative Learn. 11(2), 187–225 (2016)

  8. Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The icap framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)

  9. Chollet, M., Ochs, M., Pelachaud, C.: From non-verbal signals sequence mining to bayesian networks for interpersonal attitudes expression. In: Bickmore, T., Marsella, S., Sidner, C. (eds.) IVA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8637, pp. 120–133. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09767-1_15

  10. Cohen, E.G., Lotan, R.A.: Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom, 3rd edn. Teachers College Press (2014)

  11. Craig, S.D., D’Mello, S., Witherspoon, A., Graesser, A.: Emote aloud during learning with autotutor: applying the facial action coding system to cognitive-affective states during learning. Cogn. Emot. 22(5), 777–788 (2008)

  12. Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E., Mavrikis, M., Spikol, D.: Diagnosing collaboration in practice-based learning: equality and intra-individual variability of physical interactivity. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10474, pp. 30–42. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_3

  13. Ferschke, O., Yang, D., Tomar, G., Rosé, C.P.: Positive impact of collaborative chat participation in an edX MOOC. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M.F. (eds.) AIED 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9112, pp. 115–124. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_12

  14. Forestier, S., Oudeyer, P.Y.: Curiosity-driven development of tool use precursors: a computational model. In: 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI 2016), pp. 1859–1864 (2016)

  15. Golman, R., Loewenstein, G.: An information-gap theory of feelings about uncertainty (2016)

  16. Gordon, G., Breazeal, C., Engel, S.: Can children catch curiosity from a social robot? In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 91–98. ACM (2015)

  17. Guillame-Bert, M., Crowley, J.L.: Learning temporal association rules on symbolic time sequences. In: Asian Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 159–174 (2012)

  18. Hussain, M.S., AlZoubi, O., Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S.K.: Affect detection from multichannel physiology during learning sessions with autotutor. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6738, pp. 131–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_19

  19. Kidd, C., Hayden, B.Y.: The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity. Neuron 88(3), 449–460 (2015)

  20. Kim, K.H.: The creativity crisis: the decrease in creative thinking scores on the torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Res. J. 23(4), 285–295 (2011)

  21. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P.A.: Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: the collective working-memory effect. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 25(4), 615–624 (2011)

  22. Kotsiantis, S., Kanellopoulos, D.: Association rules mining: a recent overview. GESTS Int. Trans. Comput. Sci. Eng. 32(1), 71–82 (2006)

  23. Lehman, B., D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Who benefits from confusion induction during learning? An individual differences cluster analysis. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 51–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_6

  24. Lehman, B., Matthews, M., D’Mello, S., Person, N.: What are you feeling? investigating student affective states during expert human tutoring sessions. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 50–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_10

  25. Loewenstein, G.: The psychology of curiosity: a review and reinterpretation. Psychol. Bull. 116(1), 75 (1994)

  26. Louwerse, M.M., Dale, R., Bard, E.G., Jeuniaux, P.: Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognit. Sci. 36(8), 1404–1426 (2012)

  27. Ludvigsen, S.: CSCL: connecting the social, emotional and cognitive dimensions. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collaborative Learn. 11(2), 115–121 (2016)

  28. Noordewier, M.K., van Dijk, E.: Curiosity and time: from not knowing to almost knowing. Cogn. Emot. 31(3), 411–421 (2017)

  29. O’Connor, D.: Application sharing in K-12 education: teaching and learning with Rube Goldberg. TechTrends 47(5), 6–13 (2003)

  30. Piekny, J., Maehler, C.: Scientific reasoning in early and middle childhood: the development of domain-general evidence evaluation, experimentation, and hypothesis generation skills. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 31(2), 153–179 (2013)

  31. Silvia, P.J., Kashdan, T.B.: Interesting things and curious people: exploration and engagement as transient states and enduring strengths. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 3(5), 785–797 (2009)

  32. Sinha, T., Bai, Z., Cassell, J.: Curious minds wonder alike: studying multimodal behavioral dynamics to design social scaffolding of curiosity. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10474, pp. 270–285. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_20

  33. Sinha, T., Bai, Z., Cassell, J.: A new theoretical framework for curiosity for learning in social contexts. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10474, pp. 254–269. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_19

  34. Von Stumm, S., Hell, B., Chamorro-Premuzic, T.: The hungry mind: intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6(6), 574–588 (2011)

  35. Walter, F., Bruch, H.: The positive group affect spiral: a dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 29(2), 239–261 (2008)

  36. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F.: Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: concepts and assessment. Learn. Instr. 17(4), 416–426 (2007)

  37. Wen, M., Yang, D., Rosé, C.P.: Virtual teams in massive open online courses. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M.F. (eds.) AIED 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9112, pp. 820–824. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_124

  38. Wu, Q., Miao, C.: Modeling curiosity-related emotions for virtual peer learners. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 8(2), 50–62 (2013)

  39. Zhao, R., Sinha, T., Black, A.W., Cassell, J.: Socially-aware virtual agents: automatically assessing dyadic rapport from temporal patterns of behavior. In: Traum, D., Swartout, W., Khooshabeh, P., Kopp, S., Scherer, S., Leuski, A. (eds.) IVA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10011, pp. 218–233. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_20

Download references

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Te puede interesar también
la-cara-oculta-de-la-mision-dart:-genero-enormes-rocas-en-el-espacio-que-complican-otras-misiones-en-el-futuro
Tecnología

La cara oculta de la misión DART: generó enormes rocas en el espacio que complican otras misiones en el futuro

El pasado 11 de octubre del año 2022, la humanidad hizo historia. Se supo  que la misión DART, que impactó contra el asteroide Dimorphos, alteró su trayectoria, probando que efectivamente esta podía ser una medida de defensa planetaria. Unos investigadores aseguran que no fue tan exitosa como parece. Una investigación liderada por la Universidad de Maryland ubicada

Leer Más >>
obstaculos-de-la-fe
Religión

OBSTÁCULOS DE LA FE

Verdaderamente si hay un elemento importante en la vida cristiana es la fe, nosotros los cristianos andamos por fe, vivimos por fe, oramos con fe, y por la fe permanecemos firmes. Jesús les dijo: Por vuestra poca fe; porque de cierto os digo, que si tuviereis fe como un grano de mostaza, diréis a este

Leer Más >>

¿Quieres hablar con nosotros en cabina?

Nuestros Horarios en el Estudio:

9am a 11am | 12m a 1pm | 4 a 5 pm | 5 a 6pm

horario del pacifico